Forums → Forum Games → Count to 100: Sporangium

79646 73460158
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,883 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 54 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

53. 100! - January 08, '26, 11 users, 106 days
ShadowCloak1 [2], rida2012 [2], ismael6 [3], Widestsinger (1)[8], iliketrainsandtables, sciller45 (6)[20], HalRazor [7], SirLegendary (2)[25], TheMostManlyMan (1)[17], Unbl, nichodemus (2)[10]

54. 100! - April 26, '26, 12 users, 102 days
ShadowCloak1 (1)[3], sciller45 (6)[21], Widestsinger (1)[9], SirLegendary (2)[26], ismael6 [4], rida2012 [3], TheMostManlyMan (1)[18], HalRazor [8], Majestic_Fish (2)[15], Greg7077 [2], PHLHimself [2], Unbl [2]

  • 79,646 Replies
sciller45
offline
sciller45
2,988 posts
Chancellor

49. Also, may I place the point of existence not existing in existence for if existence exists existence by extension exists. But what do we define existence? I define existence as existing in minds. As long as the idea of existence exists, existence exists.

As far as politics go with me, as long as there is no big red S next to the dude, I'm fine.

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

50. Existence is an inherent part of existence, that’s for sure. *making a smart face*

kalisenpai
offline
kalisenpai
1,858 posts
Regent

51. Well, I'm too lazy to think about existence...

sciller45
offline
sciller45
2,988 posts
Chancellor

52. We should all thank you. We can make up a story of love and betrayal and cool spiky dragons on the way, eh?

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

53. You know what? I just don’t meddle in politics. Couldn’t repay you with a brief of PL’s political parties. I vote for PiS every year, best of the worst I’d call ‘em.

kalisenpai
offline
kalisenpai
1,858 posts
Regent

54. Okay, so there was this dragon in love with the princess. But the princess was lesbian, what a bluff for the dragon!

sciller45
offline
sciller45
2,988 posts
Chancellor

55. Khmm khmm. Once upon a time there was a dragon called Overlord. Ironically, he always wanted to pet dogs and skip in fields of flower. But then, the dragon society came in...

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

56. We could concoct some story on the go, with a love of cool spiky dragons, naturally.

kalisenpai
offline
kalisenpai
1,858 posts
Regent

57. But an evil dragon or a good one? Or a neutral one... Neural, the neutral dragon.

sciller45
offline
sciller45
2,988 posts
Chancellor

58. Overlord was, of course, pretty pissed to find out the princess didn't love him. So after talking to her, they peacefully resolved it and went their own ways. BUT THEN

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

59. Oh we’re doing it right away? Aaah I don’t have an inspiration. They dragon had two faces, just like split personality 0_0 He was both good and bad.

kalisenpai
offline
kalisenpai
1,858 posts
Regent

60. The dragon then found out that princess was, in fact, bisexual. Evil dragon was angry, good dragon was sad... Why did she reject them?

sciller45
offline
sciller45
2,988 posts
Chancellor

61. Neural, the dragon's *other* face decided to eat her because he couldn't live with modern diplomatic standards. Luckily, Overlord controlled the wings, so he let the princess live away from harm.

PLGuy
offline
PLGuy
4,755 posts
King

62. It turned out the princess only liked people that are grey, in between two extreme, that which are most natural.

kalisenpai
offline
kalisenpai
1,858 posts
Regent

63. "And you're three dragons, how horrible is that?" the princess said.
The three-in-one dragon(s) heard her voice for the first time. Gosh, it was horrible!

Showing 74056-74070 of 79646