Back to 1969 where US moonwalking in the moon and MJ moonwalking on earth.
The question is......
Do you think it's true or lie?
If it's true, I mean, with poor technology at that time 1970s. Why we don't go to the moon again now? Why we don't make a very convincing movie to the moon now?
I mean, today's technology is 1000 times faster better and stronger right?
I think I saw 3 shadows in moonwalking videos on youtube, I could be means:
a. 3 suns. b. 3 lightbulbs. c. 3 persons that forget to turn the other 2 lightbulbs, right?
It's been proven that it's not fake, time and time again. Now shut up.
why u always end up with 'now, shut up'. Your friends shut u up recently?
so, how about the HOT question?
Why not making a ship to go the moon again? Today's technology is 1000 times better and cheaper right? If not, I consider too many stupid lives in US now and then lol
If it's true, I mean, with poor technology at that time 1970s. Why we don't go to the moon again now? Why we don't make a very convincing movie to the moon now?
The Swedish astronaut Christer Fuglesang (I think that's how you spelled it..) just returned from his trip to the moon. ;P You need to pay a little more attention before making a topic about this.
Why not making a ship to go the moon again? Today's technology is 1000 times better and cheaper right? If not, I consider too many stupid lives in US now and then lol
Your right its not like the USA is in a recession right now, already in billions of dollars of debt, and has no reason to go to the moon...
(BTW, that was sarcasm for those of you who havent figured that out...)
The moon is actually quite pointless other than looking pretty, but I believe it happened, it would actually be a tough thing for the men to suddenly show up in the atlantic ocean in a large craft without anyone noticing if they didn't break the atmosphere.
And going back is pointless and a waste of resources
And going back is pointless and a waste of resources
If humans are ever going to advance past Earth, the moon is our first step for colonization. It's not as pointless as it is a waste resources right now.
I mean, today's technology is 1000 times faster better and stronger right?
It isn't, but I'll play along.
We don't go back because there's nothing there we really care about at the moment. Pretty simple. If you researched this you would know NASA's timeline has us colonizing the moon in...can't remember the year -P And visiting mars in 2050. Or is it visiting mars then colonizing the moon in 2050?....darn...
And all those dumb things you read on the internet that prove we didn't land on the moon are false. The flag is waving because the guy's putting it in the ground, he's exerting force on it. The moon gets hit by light from the sun so it should have shadows =P The appearance that some shadows are facing different directions is merely an optical illusion.
If humans are ever going to advance past Earth, the moon is our first step for colonization. It's not as pointless as it is a waste resources right now.
Mathematically you are wrong
Practically you are wrong
And logically you are wrong
It is more effective to build space stations in the earth's gravity that orbit the earth and launch from that rather than anything on the moon
Do you understand a word anyone is saying? It's not 1000 times cheaper, technology is better, but technology is way more expensive and NASA can't afford it.
Ok, thx. This is just a thread, u don't need to start 'shut up', twice.
Guys, thx for all your answers.
The vote are.......
Well... in this forum, moonwalking is winning.
But who knows the truth, none of us here have to the moon right?
Ok, discussion dismissed, I called a mod to lock it.
Klaus, don't get hot to quickly, at least not in your real life k?
